The United States government should ban gun control laws Research Paper

The United States governance should throw out heavy weapon control laws - seek Paper ExampleWatson (2005) fight that the atom smasher politics have be grow a significant issue whereby many political leaders have come up with ideologies relating to possessing shots through illegal and non-illegal use. They address this issue basing on the safety of the state, but the flatulence politics deals with the issue of regulations, personal possessing of firearms and restriction of using guns. The issues of gun control have become the foremost debate in the United States. This isbecause the proponents argue that bearing guns will contribute to widespread danger whereas the opponents argue that it is one of the respective(prenominal)istic rights for self-security. Gun politics in the US has been a serious and long debate in the American politics. The debate concerning the possession of guns has been for long decades the issue. Some politicians argue that the gun control should be pro hibited whereas opposites argue that gun control should be permissible. Those who support the US citizens from possessing the guns argue that it is one of the constitutional act of individual right of self-security. They argue this basing on the second Amendment of constitutional right bill that permits and protects individual rights of owning handguns. This constitution right was ratified in December 1971 together with other Bill of Rights. However, the Supreme Court ruled out the second amendment of permitting an individual to own handguns in a state for self-protection. The arguments in favor for banning the gun control laws are varied. First, the society requires reasonable gun control laws. The local and federal government enacted laws that protect and defends the property of pile in the US. Thus, proponents of restrictive gun control laws argue that, by under- regulating, the law will put the state residents at unreasonable risk. This is because the community requires reason able gun control that would not clear any risk to the public. Crooker (2003) asserts that the American people may feelunsafe in case the government allows everyone in the community to carry a gun. Although the government may ban gun control, they should prohibit ordinary citizens from using the gun in the public places such as schools, hospitals, churches and market places. The government should offer the citizens of US a right for reasonable protection from any causes of danger especially danger of using the gun. Secondly, high rates of firearm related violence and change magnitude deaths such as homicides are behind theneed for banning the gun control. The proponents of gun control argue that the gun control should be made illegal. This is because owe personal firearms will contribute to increased crimes such as homicides and increased deaths in a state. The research report of 2011 indicated that about 47 percent of people in US own personal firearms in their houses (Watson, 200 5). Thus, about 20 percent of homicides occur in many parts of the US because many families own private handguns. Therefore, banning gun control is essential because it will reduce cases of homicides, which are common in some states, in the American society. Those supporting the ban of gun control believe that by restricting gun ownership in the US state, government will be able to lessen gun related crimes such as suicide and homicides. This is because the research report indicates that gun related crimes are high in US with the majority of homicides being report to be high followed by suicide. Watson 2005) argue that gun related